Decision intelligence that shows its work - or honestly refuses.

Auxograph builds a governed reasoning layer for evidence-heavy professional decisions. Every answer carries the records behind it. When sources disagree, the disagreement is preserved and shown, never averaged away. And when the evidence cannot support an answer, the system declines on the record and names exactly what is missing.

Patent pending: three US provisional applications, July and August 2026. A working, certified system stands behind every claim on this page.

Three disciplines, enforced by architecture

Most software confidently returns an answer even when it should not. Auxograph is built so the confident wrong answer is structurally impossible.

Provenance

Every conclusion carries its receipt

Each finding cites the source records behind it, with stated confidence. An assertion with no admissible evidence cannot be stored or surfaced. What reaches a person is an audit-ready case file, not a claim to take on faith.

Contradiction

Disagreement is a finding, not a nuisance

When two sources conflict, both sides are preserved and presented, the path is blocked, and a human decides. The system never picks a winner behind your back, because an averaged contradiction is how quiet errors become expensive ones.

Refusal

The honest refusal, on the record

Where the file cannot establish a fact, the system says so, states the reason, and names what would resolve it. Absence of evidence is never treated as evidence of absence. The refusal is a feature; in regulated work, it is the feature.

Built, certified, and running

Nothing here is a roadmap. The numbers below are machine-counted from the working system.

3,772
automated certification tests, re-runnable from a clean checkout
124K
lines of production software on one governed core
12/12
reasoning skills proven to generalize, tested blind against live federal data
1,080
adversarial cases built from real regulatory evidence, zero false certainty at exit

Where it works today

One engine, applied where the cost of an unverifiable answer is highest.

Wealth management compliance

Review-ready client files, generated inside the CRM your firm already runs. Beneficiary contradictions caught, risk-tolerance conflicts flagged as conflicts, every recommendation carrying its evidence - the supervision artifact 2026 examinations now describe.

Infrastructure siting and tariffs

Page-cited eligibility analysis against real regulatory orders, with a decision ledger that flags exactly which of your assumptions a new order reopens. Built and hardened on the tariff regime reshaping data-center economics.

Evidence-heavy professional analysis

Cited chronologies and contradiction registers for claims disputes, diligence, and any practice whose product is the analysis itself - accelerating the evidence assembly under the judgment your clients pay for.

Twenty minutes with the live system.

A walkthrough on demonstration data, built in front of you. If it is not obviously useful in that time, we will not ask for a twenty-first minute.

dcnu2500@gmail.com